In a controversial move, former President Donald Trump has reportedly revoked the Secret Service protection assigned to President Joe Biden’s children, marking a significant escalation in the political divide between the two administrations. The decision, which has sparked debate over security protocols for the families of U.S. leaders, raises concerns about political retaliation and the precedent it sets for future transitions of power.
End of Protection for Biden’s Children
According to sources familiar with the matter, the Secret Service protection assigned to Hunter Biden and Ashley Biden was terminated under Trump’s directive. Typically, the children of sitting U.S. presidents receive extended security coverage as a matter of national security, especially given their high-profile status. The move has raised questions regarding the rationale behind such a decision and whether it aligns with standard protocol.
Political Motivations or Policy Change?
Critics argue that this decision is a politically motivated act rather than a routine policy change. Given the ongoing tensions between Trump and Biden, some view this as an extension of their political rivalry. Others, however, suggest that it could be part of a broader cost-cutting measure or an effort to redefine Secret Service policies regarding who qualifies for long-term protection.
Under current U.S. Secret Service guidelines, immediate family members of a president typically receive protection while they are in office and up to six months after they leave. However, extensions are sometimes granted depending on the perceived risk to family members.
🚨BREAKING: President Trump just announced Hunter and Ashley Biden will no longer receive Secret Service protection. pic.twitter.com/e6Lw4uWNt2
Security Concerns and Public Reaction
Security analysts warn that removing protection for high-profile figures such as the children of a sitting president could expose them to unnecessary risks. Hunter Biden, in particular, has been a subject of intense public scrutiny and legal investigations, making him a potential security target.
Supporters of the move, however, argue that presidential children should not receive indefinite protection at taxpayers' expense, particularly if they are not actively involved in government affairs.
White House and Secret Service Response
The Biden administration has not yet commented publicly on the reported decision. The Secret Service, which operates independently of direct political influence, has also refrained from making an official statement, citing security confidentiality policies.
This move, if confirmed, could set a new precedent for security protocols surrounding the families of U.S. presidents, raising fresh debates over national security, political influence, and the role of the Secret Service in protecting public officials and their families.