Senior Trump aide Alina Habba has stirred political debate by revealing an inside look at what she calls Joe Biden’s “fake Oval Office”, a staged set used for official appearances during Biden’s presidency. The revelation has sparked discussions about the use of controlled environments in White House communications.
What is the ‘Fake Oval Office’?
-
The set was located in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), adjacent to the White House.
-
It was frequently used during Biden’s presidency for televised addresses, press briefings, and key policy announcements.
-
The backdrop included simulated windows displaying the White House Rose Garden, creating a realistic setting for media appearances.
-
Equipped with advanced lighting, teleprompters, and digital displays, it allowed for better-controlled communication environments.
Habba’s Criticism
During a behind-the-scenes tour, Habba criticized the setup, calling it “a disgrace” and questioning why such a staged environment was necessary.
“This is where Biden pretended to run the country, in a fake office with scripted responses. The American people deserve transparency.”
She, along with other critics, argues that the set allowed Biden to deliver scripted messages without the traditional constraints of a live setting, fueling claims that his presidency relied heavily on staged optics rather than real-time leadership.
Counselor to the President, Alina Habba, Shows Off President Joe Biden's "Fake" Oval Office#OAN #Breaking #Latest #POTUS #WhiteHouse pic.twitter.com/1ZcHepwFfs
Supporters’ Justification
-
Defenders of the setup point out that previous administrations have also used controlled sets for major addresses.
-
The Biden administration justified the use of the set as a way to incorporate modern technology into messaging and to allow the president to communicate more effectively with the public.
-
The set was particularly useful during COVID-19 briefings, ensuring that remote communications and public health updates were delivered in an accessible format.
Past Reactions & Political Fallout
-
Former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller commented that the virtual set was specifically designed to allow Biden to read scripts more naturally without the visibility of teleprompter glass.
-
Republican critics argue that the use of staged settings raises concerns about transparency, while Democrats defend it as a practical media tool.
-
This revelation adds to the ongoing partisan divide over media control and presidential messaging.
Alina Habba’s exposure of Biden’s “fake Oval Office” has reignited discussions about the role of staged environments in politics. While some view it as a media necessity, others argue it reflects a disconnect between government officials and the public. With political optics playing an increasing role in governance, the debate over authenticity vs. controlled messaging is likely to continue.